The dynamical influence (DI) quantifies how strongly a node's dynamical state can affect the collective behavior of a networked system, explicitly accounting for the interplay between structure and dynamics [2]. Conceptually, it estimates the potential impact of a node on a spreading process before the contagion begins, given the system dynamics.
Klemm et al. [2] consider the SIR model, where each node can be susceptible, infected, or recovered. Linearizing the dynamics around the stationary state in which all nodes are susceptible, small perturbations obey
\begin{equation*}
\dot{x} = -x[t] + β A^T x[t],
\end{equation*}
where \(x_j[t]\) is the probability that node \(j\) is infected at time \(t\), \(β\) is the infection probability and \(A\) is the adjacency matrix. This equation can be rewritten as \(\dot{x} = M x\) with \(M = β A^T - I\). At the epidemic threshold, \(β = 1/λ_{\max}(A)\), the largest eigenvalue of \(M\) is zero, i.e., \(\dot{x} = 0\).
The dynamical influence of nodes, \(c_{DI}\), is given by the leading left eigenvector of \(M\). Equivalently, under the linearization and threshold assumption, \(c_{DI}\) corresponds to the right eigenvector of \(A\) associated with its largest eigenvalue, meaning that, in this case, dynamical influence reduces to eigenvector centrality.

References

[1] Shvydun, S. (2025). Zoo of Centralities: Encyclopedia of Node Metrics in Complex Networks. arXiv: 2511.05122 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.05122
[2] Klemm, K., Serrano, M. Á., Eguíluz, V. M., & Miguel, M. S. (2012). A measure of individual role in collective dynamics. Scientific reports, 2(1), 292. doi: 10.1038/srep00292.