Eigenvector centrality (also known as the principal eigenvector or left dominant eigenvector) was initially introduced by Landau [2] in the context of chess tournaments. The concept was later independently rediscovered by Wei [3] and subsequently popularized by Kendall [4] for sports ranking. Berge [5] extended the idea by proposing a general definition of eigenvector centrality for graphs based on social connections. Later, Bonacich [6] reintroduced and further popularized the measure, particularly in the context of link analysis.
Eigenvector centrality generalizes degree centrality by accounting not only for the number of connections of a node, but also for the centrality of its neighbours [7, 8]. Formally, the importance \(c_{ev}(i)\) of a node \(i\) is proportional to the sum of the importances of its neighbours, which themselves depend on the importances of their neighbours, and so on, i.e.,
\begin{equation*}
c_{ev}(i) = \frac{1}{λ_{max}} \sum_{(i,j)\in \mathcal{L}}{c_{ev}(j)}=\frac{1}{λ_{max}} \sum_{j=1}^{N}{a_{ij} \cdot c_{ev}(j)}.
\end{equation*}
The calculation of eigenvector centrality can be formulated as an eigenvalue problem, where \(λ_{\text{max}}\) is the largest eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix \(A\), and \(c_{ev}\) is the corresponding eigenvector. Eigenvector centrality is typically applied to undirected networks; however, it can, in theory, also be computed for directed networks, although certain complications arise in the directed case [8].

References

[1] Shvydun, S. (2025). Zoo of Centralities: Encyclopedia of Node Metrics in Complex Networks. arXiv: 2511.05122 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.05122
[2] Landau, E. (1895). Zur relativen wertbemessung der turnierresultate. Deutsches Wochenschach, 11(366-369), 3.
[3] Wei, T. H. (1952). The Algebraic Foundations of Ranking Theory. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
[4] Kendall, M. G. (1955). Further contributions to the theory of paired comparisons. Biometrics, 11(1), 43-62. doi: 10.2307/3001479.
[5] Berge, C. (1958). Théorie des graphes et ses applications. Dunod, Paris, France. doi: 10.1002/zamm.19600400516.
[6] Bonacich, P. (1972). Technique for analyzing overlapping memberships. Sociological methodology, 4, 176-185. doi: 10.2307/270732.
[7] Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2(1), 113-120. doi: 10.1080/0022250X.1972.9989806.
[8] Newman, M. (2018). Networks. Oxford university press. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198805090.001.0001.