Katz centrality , also known as Katz prestige, is a generalization of eigenvector centrality [2, 3]. In the original formulation, the influence of a node \(i\) is measured by a weighted sum of all powers of the adjacency matrix \(A\), with an attenuation factor \(α\):
\begin{equation*}
c_{\mathrm{Katz}}(i) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \sum_{j=1}^{N} α^k \, (A^k)_{ij},
\end{equation*}
or, equivalently, in vector form:
\begin{equation*}
\mathbf{c}_{\mathrm{Katz}} = (I - α A)^{-1} \mathbf{1},
\end{equation*}
where \(\mathbf{1}\) is the vector of all ones. The series converges only if the attenuation factor \(α\) is smaller than the reciprocal of the largest eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix \(A\), i.e., \(α < 1 / λ_{\max}\), where \(λ_{\max}\) denotes the principal eigenvalue of \(A\).
Katz centrality is closely related to Bonacich’s power centrality \(c_{\mathrm{power}}\) [4], which is defined as
\begin{equation*}
c_{\mathrm{power}} = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \sum_{j=1}^{N} α^k \, (A^{k+1})_{ij}.
\end{equation*}
The two measures are directly proportional, with Bonacich's power centrality expressed in terms of Katz centrality as
\begin{equation*}
c_{\mathrm{power}} = α \, c_{\mathrm{Katz}}.
\end{equation*}
A further generalization, often referred to as alpha centrality or Bonacich alpha centrality , introduces an exogenous factor \(β\) and allows \(α\) to take negative values to model negative influence [4, 5, 6]. The centrality of node \(i\) is then defined by
\begin{equation*}
c_{α}(i) = α \sum_{j=1}^{N} a_{ij} \, c_{α}(j) + β,
\end{equation*}
where \(α\) and \(β\) are positive constants. This formulation balances the contribution from the eigenvector-like term with the constant \(β\). In most current implementations, \(α\) is set to \(0.1\) and \(β\) to \(1.0\). Bonacich and Lloyd [5] demonstrated that Katz and alpha centralities differ only by a constant \(β\) under the condition
\(α < \frac{1}{λ_{\max}}\), with \(λ_{\max}\) being the principal eigenvalue of \(A\).

References

[1] Shvydun, S. (2025). Zoo of Centralities: Encyclopedia of Node Metrics in Complex Networks. arXiv: 2511.05122 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.05122
[2] Katz, L. (1953). A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika, 18(1), 39-43. doi: 10.1007/BF02289026.
[3] Newman, M. (2018). Networks. Oxford university press. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198805090.001.0001.
[4] Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American journal of sociology, 92(5), 1170-1182.
[5] Bonacich, P., & Lloyd, P. (2001). Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations. Social networks, 23(3), 191-201. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(01)00038-7.
[6] Poulin, R., Boily, M. C., & Mâsse, B. R. (2000). Dynamical systems to define centrality in social networks. Social networks, 22(3), 187-220. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(00)00020-4.