Zeta vector centrality , also referred to as node displacement [2] or topological centrality [3], identifies the most effective “spreader” node in a network [4]. Inspired by electrical flows in a resistor network, Van Mieghem et al. define the best conducting node \(i\) in a graph \(G\) as the node that minimizes the diagonal element \(Q^{\dagger}_{ii}\) of the pseudoinverse \(Q^{\dagger}\) of the weighted Laplacian matrix of \(G\):\begin{equation*}c_{\rm Zeta}(i) = Q^{\dagger}_{ii} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{j=1}^{N} ω_{ji} - \frac{R̃_G}{N^2},\end{equation*}where \(ω_{ji}\) is the effective resistance between nodes \(j\) and \(i\), and \(R̃_G\) is the effective graph resistance. In other words, \(c_{\rm Zeta}(i)\) represents the average effective resistance from node \(i\) to all other nodes, minus the mean effective resistance of the graph.The node with minimal \(c_{\rm Zeta}(i)\) is the best electrical spreader, having the lowest energy or potential and the strongest connectivity to the rest of the network. Alternative interpretations of \(Q^{\dagger}_{ii}\) include detour overheads in random walks or the average connectedness of nodes when the network splits, highlighting the node’s role in global communication [3]. The ranking of nodes based on \(Q^{\dagger}_{ii}\) is equivalent to node displacement [2], computed as\begin{equation*}\Delta x_i = \sqrt{\frac{Q^{\dagger}_{ii}}{β k}},\end{equation*}where \(k\) is a common spring constant and \(β\) is the inverse temperature, linking network topology to physical interpretations of displacement.

References

[1] Shvydun, S. (2025). Zoo of Centralities: Encyclopedia of Node Metrics in Complex Networks. arXiv: 2511.05122 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.05122
[2] Estrada, E., & Hatano, N. (2010). A vibrational approach to node centrality and vulnerability in complex networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 389(17), 3648-3660. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2010.03.030.
[3] Ranjan, G., & Zhang, Z. L. (2013). Geometry of complex networks and topological centrality. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 392(17), 3833-3845. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2013.04.013.
[4] Van Mieghem, P., Devriendt, K., & Cetinay, H. (2017). Pseudoinverse of the Laplacian and best spreader node in a network. Physical Review E, 96(3), 032311. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.032311.